levy

meet baron von sebottendorf—founder of the thule society and one of the most fascinating figures of early 20th-century` europe`.

born in 1875, he moved to istanbul in 1901 at age 26, became an ottoman citizen, and worked as a maritime merchant. while in turkey, he immersed himself in bektashi, sabbatean, and masonic circles, and studied sufism, kabbalah, and other eastern philosophies.

after world war i, he returned to germany with all that knowledge and started organizing nationalist socialist workers' movements to combat the rising threat of communism. one of the most notable was the thule society, often linked to the occult influences behind nazism. he had a reputation for machiavellian tactics—at times allowing high-ranking party members to fall into communist hands so he could frame them as "martyrs" for the nationalist cause.

although he founded the german national socialist workers' party, it eventually came under adolf hitler's control, and he and hitler began to drift apart. by the 1930s, he was exiled from germany by the gestapo and returned to turkey. during world war ii, he worked as a double agent for both germany and britain. in 1945, he tragically ended his life by throwing himself into the cold waters of the bosphorus.

check out elon musk's whole h-1b drama. remember when he forced twitter employees into a new "take it or leave" agreement? if you look at photos after that ultimatum, you'll see very few white americans left. most of the remaining folks look like they're on h-1b visas. (yeah, i'm guessing from appearances, but let's be real.)

once musk took over twitter, he discovered the "benefits" of using h-1b labor—big-time. he fired a ton of engineers, but someone still had to keep the place running, and that burden fell on these h-1b holders.

why them? because if the boss says "who do you think you are?" and they can't find another job within 60 days, they'll be forced to leave the country. meta did something similar. and if home is india, you can imagine the predicament—when your boss says "jump," you don't have many other options. anyone who's endured six years on h-1b (unless their company files for a green card right away) knows it's not just "go back home." it's more like "good luck making it back here again anytime soon."

even though my own h-1b experience was in the public sector, i've still felt that sense of being stuck. in private companies—especially under ceos like elon musk—some h-1b folks end up in a situation worse than modern indentured servitude. actually, it's just straight-up servitude. if you're from a country like belgium, you might just say "to heck with this" and head home to a decent life. but if you're a young engineer from india, where are you going to go? you can't just bail out and fly home without losing your future here.

anyone who's spent years on an h-1b in the private sector understands this. if these big companies truly cared about improving stem in america, they'd start by fixing our k-12 education instead of constantly importing cheap labor. if they were sincere, they'd solve the ridiculous green card backlog for indian professionals.

but honestly, their main goal is to grab a pliable, underpaid workforce and push down wages for everyone else. musk jump-started that by gutting twitter, and other companies are following his lead.

homo economicus, often referred to as the "economic man," is a theoretical construct in classical and neoclassical economics. under this model, individuals are assumed to:

– act rationally and consistently to maximize their self-interest (or "utility").
– have complete or near-complete information about available choices.
– weigh costs and benefits to make optimal decisions.

the father of western philosophy. over 2,300 years ago, aristotle, one of the greatest thinkers in human history, shaped the foundation of western philosophy, science, and ethics. his work continues to inspire modern thought, proving that wisdom truly knows no bounds.

why aristotle matters:
1. philosophy pioneer: aristotle's writings on metaphysics, ethics, and politics laid the groundwork for centuries of intellectual exploration. his philosophy bridged the gap between science and spirituality.
2. father of logic: he invented formal logic, introducing concepts like syllogisms that remain relevant in critical thinking today.
3. scientific method: aristotle's observational approach to biology and the natural world set the stage for empirical science.
4. ethics of virtue: his idea of achieving "eudaimonia" (a flourishing life) through virtuous actions still resonates in self-help and leadership.

interesting facts about aristotle:
• teacher to a king: aristotle mentored alexander the great, influencing one of history's most legendary rulers.
• founder of a school: his school, the lyceum, pioneered interdisciplinary learning, hosting debates on everything from astronomy to zoology.
• polymath extraordinaire: aristotle wrote about nearly every field of study in existence at the time—philosophy, politics, biology, meteorology, and even drama.

aristotle's famous quotes:
– "knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom."
– "it is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it."
– "happiness depends upon ourselves."
– "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts."

cristiano ronaldo is the second-best and second-most consistent soccer player of all time, and he hasn't become a champion in saudi arabia for three years.

this book explains, to a large extent, why some societies thrive while others don’t—when combined with average intelligence levels. but why isn’t intelligence alone enough? let me break it down:

we’re all familiar with south and north korea. south korea is incredibly advanced, constantly innovating, producing high-tech goods, and getting wealthier by the day. the country’s per capita income is more than 20 times that of north korea. in fact, due to the poverty and hunger in the north, south koreans are taller and live longer than their northern neighbors. north korea, on the other hand, can’t even feed its people without foreign aid, let alone produce technology.

the reason behind all this is what acemoglu describes as “extractive” and “inclusive” institutions. south korea has inclusive institutions, while north korea is stuck with extractive ones. as a result, while the south is advancing into space, the north is struggling with famine.

but there’s an important point we need to consider: the average iq levels in these two countries. despite north korea’s backwardness and hardships, their average iq is pretty close to that of south koreans. in fact, south koreans have some of the highest average iq levels in the world.

so what does this mean? it means that even after 50+ years of oppressive extractive institutions, north koreans still have an average iq of around 105, just like their neighbors in the south. if north korea’s extractive institutions were to collapse tomorrow (say, north korea reunites with the south), north koreans would likely become just as wealthy, innovative, and successful as south koreans in a short period of time.

this is where the importance of north koreans’ iq comes in. the moment they break free from their extractive system, they have the potential to become one of the most advanced nations in the world. meanwhile, many countries in latin america or eastern europe that are governed by inclusive institutions haven’t reached south korea’s level of development. this is where the average intelligence of a society plays a role.

take brazil, for instance. despite having inclusive institutions like south korea, brazil’s average iq is around 90, not 105 like south korea. that’s why brazil isn’t able to reach the same level of development. so, while inclusive and extractive institutions are key factors in a nation’s growth, average intelligence levels are equally important.

this means that even if countries like brazil have inclusive institutions, they won’t reach south korea’s level of development unless their average iq rises to similar levels. on the other hand, since north korea has high average intelligence, the moment they switch from extractive to inclusive institutions, they’ll skyrocket to south korea’s level.

of course, establishing inclusive institutions requires a certain level of intelligence. the elites who run extractive systems never want to share power, so it’s up to the people to pressure the elites and force them to create inclusive institutions. but for that to happen, the population needs to be aware and capable of demanding change. while some countries in latin america have managed to do this, north koreans haven’t—likely because of east asia’s ultra-conservative, community-over-individual culture.

this conservative, non-individualistic culture stifles creativity in east asia. a simple example is the apple vs. samsung rivalry. apple, a product of western culture, innovates and changes the world, while samsung takes what apple creates and optimizes it. sure, samsung might beat apple with optimized products, but they’ll never make world-changing innovations like apple does. and that’s because of east asia’s conservative culture. could this be linked to genetics? maybe, but research in this area is still too new to draw any firm conclusions.
(see: daron acemoglu)