revenge

there are many different approaches to taking revenge, and some argue that seeking revenge is not a productive or healthy way to deal with conflicts or wrongdoings. here are a few examples of different philosophies and approaches to taking revenge:

an eye for an eye: this approach is based on the idea of reciprocity, and holds that when someone does something wrong or harmful to you, it is justified to do something wrong or harmful to them in return. this approach is often associated with the saying "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."

forgiveness: this approach involves letting go of anger and resentment towards someone who has wronged you, and choosing not to seek revenge or retribution. many religions and spiritual traditions advocate for forgiveness as a way to find inner peace and move on from conflicts.

restorative justice: this approach focuses on repairing the harm caused by wrongdoing, rather than seeking punishment for the person who caused the harm. restorative justice involves bringing the offender and the victim together to discuss the harm that was caused and finding ways to make things right.

holding onto anger is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die. - buddha

ancient greek philosophers had a range of views on revenge. here are a few examples:

socrates: socrates believed that seeking revenge was a sign of weakness and immaturity, and that it was more important to focus on living a virtuous life and cultivating wisdom.

plato: plato argued that seeking revenge was not a legitimate way to address wrongs or injuries, and that true justice required a more rational and dispassionate approach.

aristotle: aristotle believed that seeking revenge could be justified in certain circumstances, but only as a way to restore balance and proportionality to a situation. he argued that the desire for revenge should be guided by reason, and not by emotion.

epicurus: epicurus argued that seeking revenge was not a productive or healthy way to deal with conflicts or wrongdoings, and that it was better to focus on cultivating inner peace and happiness.

zeno: zeno, the founder of stoicism, argued that it was important to control one's emotions and not let anger or resentment dictate one's actions. he believed that seeking revenge was a sign of weakness and that it was more important to focus on living a virtuous and fulfilling life.