for sure.
-
fa sho
-
random midnight ramblings
i chase the weight of the moments after rainfall
where the world is restored to its former peace, albeit heavier, and the only sounds are the whispers of wayward droplets being tossed down from the treetops to join their minuscule sea -
nusr-et
salt bae
-
imy
i miss you.
-
koi no yokan
the japanese phrase "koi no yokan" means knowing you are eventually going to fall in love with someone after you've just met. i think it's a combination of love at first sight and falling in love slowly over time.
-
users' favorite quotes
we are the average of the five people we spend the most time with.
jim rohn -
alexander the great
had an enduring desire to imitate achilles. he died at age 32. he was tutored by aristotle.
-
ffs
for fuck's sake.
-
domenec torrent
the new head coach of galatasaray. he has just arrived to istanbul. i hope he has a similar philosophy to pep guardiola.
-
ngl
not gonna lie.
-
rhetoric (aristotle)
aristotle's rhetoric is a theory of communication that was developed by the ancient greek philosopher aristotle. it is based on the idea that effective communication requires understanding the audience, the speaker's goals, and the context in which the communication takes place.
there are three main elements of aristotle's rhetoric:
ethos: this refers to the credibility or character of the speaker. a speaker with a strong ethos is more likely to be trusted and believed by the audience.
pathos: this refers to the emotional appeal of the argument. a speaker who can appeal to the emotions of the audience is more likely to persuade them.
logos: this refers to the logical appeal of the argument. a speaker who presents a well-reasoned, logical argument is more likely to persuade the audience.
to win an argument using aristotle's rhetoric, it is important to consider these elements and try to establish your own credibility, appeal to the emotions of the audience, and present a logical argument.
here are some examples of how to use aristotle's rhetoric to win an argument:
– establish your credibility: if you are an expert on the topic you are discussing, make sure to highlight your qualifications and experience. this will help to build your ethos and make your argument more persuasive.
– appeal to emotions: try to connect with your audience on an emotional level. this could involve sharing personal stories or using anecdotes to illustrate your point.
–use logic: make sure to present a well-reasoned, logical argument. use evidence to support your points and address any counterarguments.
by considering these elements of aristotle's rhetoric, you can craft a persuasive argument that is more likely to be effective in winning over your audience. -
users' favorite quotes
men fall in love with what they see, and women fall in love with what they hear. that's why men lie and women wear makeup.
-
sam altman
founder of chatgpt.
his sister (see: annie altman) claimed in a tweet that despite her brother being a billionaire, she is homeless and broke, resorting to prostitution to survive. she also accused him of sexually abusing her when they were children.
he is vegan and gay but also described as someone who schemes behind others' backs. because of this, elon musk allegedly kicked him out and severed ties.
now, he says he wants to advance artificial intelligence, but the western world lacks the financial resources to build the computers powerful enough to manage this ai. who does have that power? china. -
washington consensus
basically, the washington consensus is the name for a set of economic policies that came out of washington, d.c., in the late 1980s. picture this: latin american countries were dealing with debt crises, inflation through the roof, and overall economic chaos. so, economists from places like the imf, world bank, and the u.s. treasury got together and said, "alright, here's the game plan to fix this."
the game plan boiled down to about ten policies, stuff like:
- cut government spending
- open up to international trade
- privatize state-owned companies
- encourage foreign investment
- deregulate industries
- keep taxes simpler and broader
the thinking was, if you let markets work freely, economies would stabilize and grow. in theory, it makes sense. in practice? mixed results.
some countries saw short-term growth and lower inflation. others ended up with higher unemployment, growing inequality, and economies that were basically built for foreign investors rather than local people. it often felt like the medicine was worse than the disease, especially when governments slashed spending on healthcare and education just to balance their books.
the name itself came from an economist named john williamson, who wrote it down as more of an observation than a commandment, but it took off because it perfectly described the economic "starter pack" washington was pushing at the time.
today, people use the term either as a neutral description of free-market reform or, more often, as a critique of globalization and how rich countries try to shape poorer ones in their image. if you ever hear someone complain about "neoliberalism," they're probably talking about some version of the washington consensus. -
nudge theory
nudge theory is about guiding people without forcing them. place fruit at eye level and people choose it more often. set savings programs to enroll automatically and people save more. small changes in how choices are presented can lead to better decisions. tiny shifts. big results.