right-wing man who apparently thinks wet p-word is a medical condition. regularly humiliates himself in the public eye. (see: wap)

derogatory term for a radical feminist who advocates for women’s rights based on the belief that women hold superiority over men

in 1765, parliament passed the quartering act, requiring the colonies to provide housing for 10,000 british soldiers. a year later, two regiments of redcoats, as british soldiers were sometimes called because of their uniforms, arrived in boston. the people maintained an uneasy peace with the redcoats until march 5, 1770, when an unruly mob taunted some soldiers. the soldiers opened fire, killing three bostonians; two more later died of their wounds. calm followed for the next two years, but the basic conflict had not been resolved.

samuel adams, one of the most radical patriots, began calling the incident the boston massacre. for several years, patriots cited this incident as an example of british brutality.

became a symbol of the patriots' willingness to fight for their rights. they got their name because they could get dressed, grab their rifles, and be out the door in a minute.

it was an idea romanticized by some americans. the woman represents "american progress" leading settlers toward land and success. the print shows the stagecoaches once used to transport mail and passengers, the railroads that replaced them, and the "prairie schooner" wagons in which pioneers traveled with their belongings. the open landscape was originally home to indians and the buffalo they hunted, but settlers had arrived to farm the land. image

at the end of the spanish-american war, the united states had acquired the philippines and hawaii. this made the nation a major power in the pacific. the navy now needed to find a way to move ships from the west coast to the east coast that was more efficient than going around the tip of south america. the solution was to build a canal — a waterway connecting two bodies of water - across central america to join the atlantic ocean and the pacific ocean.

in 1903, a revolution in panama gave the country its independence from colombia. president roosevelt now had the opportunity he needed to acquire a route for the canal, since the isthmus of panama is the narrowest piece of land in the americas. the u.s. government instantly recognized the new government of panama and signed a treaty that gave the united states a ten-mile-wide "canal zone" in exchange for a fee of $10 million and an annual payment of $250,000.

piece of shit.

people in california are leaving their trunks open to dissuade thieves

an aphorism of hippocrates
image
(see: #1040)

racism is the belief that certain races are superior to others, and that the superior races are entitled to dominate and oppress the inferior ones. racism is often based on the idea that certain physical characteristics, such as skin color or facial features, determine a person's worth and capabilities. racism can manifest itself in many ways, including discrimination, prejudice, violence, and oppression. it is a pervasive problem that has been present throughout history and continues to affect people around the world today.

while the actions and behaviors associated with racism can be harmful and destructive, they do not necessarily indicate a mental health condition. racism is a complex social and cultural issue that is rooted in historical and systemic inequalities and power imbalances. it is important to address and combat racism through education, awareness, and social and political action.

the civil rights act of 1875 was a federal law that was passed by the united states congress in 1875. the act was the first federal civil rights law to be passed since the reconstruction era, and it was intended to protect the rights of all americans, regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. the act prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude in public accommodations, such as inns, public conveyances on land or water, theaters, and other places of public amusement. it also provided for criminal penalties for anyone who violated the act's provisions.

despite its good intentions, the civil rights act of 1875 was largely ineffective in achieving its goals. many states and local governments ignored the act or actively resisted its implementation, and few cases were ever brought under its provisions. in addition, the act did not address other forms of discrimination, such as discrimination on the basis of gender or religion. despite its limitations, the civil rights act of 1875 was an important step towards greater equality and justice for all americans, and it paved the way for future civil rights legislation.

the slippery slope is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument suggests that a small initial action or event will inevitably lead to a chain of other events, culminating in a significant, negative consequence. this type of argument suggests that if the initial action is allowed to happen, it will set off a chain reaction that cannot be stopped, ultimately leading to an undesirable outcome.

for example, consider the following argument:

"if we allow students to use their phones in class, it will lead to students being constantly distracted and unable to pay attention. this will result in lower grades and a decrease in overall academic performance. therefore, we should not allow students to use their phones in class."

in this argument, the initial action of allowing students to use their phones in class is presented as the first step in a chain of events that will ultimately lead to negative consequences. however, this argument does not take into account the possibility that students might be able to use their phones responsibly or that other measures could be put in place to prevent distractions.

one key problem with the slippery slope fallacy is that it often relies on exaggerated or unrealistic assumptions about the consequences of an action. it is important to carefully evaluate the evidence and consider alternative explanations when confronted with this type of argument.

in critical thinking, it is important to be aware of the slippery slope fallacy and to carefully consider the evidence and logic behind an argument, rather than simply accepting it because it seems to follow a logical sequence of events. it is also important to consider alternative explanations and to be open to the possibility that the initial action or event may not necessarily lead to the negative consequences that are being predicted.

the hawk tuah girl.
(see: hawk tuah)

imagine if the cold war and a dark comedy had a baby, and that baby was directed by the legendary stanley kubrick. that's "dr. strangelove or: how i learned to stop worrying and love the bomb."

here's the lowdown:

1. plot in a nutshell: the movie is about the absolute madness and absurdity of nuclear warfare. picture a bunch of military and political leaders trying to stop a doomsday scenario they accidentally set in motion.
--spoiler--
they fail spectacularly.
--spoiler--

2. key characters:
• dr. strangelove: he's this eccentric, wheelchair-bound ex-nazi scientist who can't control his own hand, which keeps trying to give the nazi salute. yeah, it's as wild as it sounds.
• president merkin muffley: the u.s. president, who's trying to keep things under control but is hilariously out of his depth.
• general buck turgidson: a gung-ho, slightly unhinged military man who thinks the solution to everything is more bombs.
• major kong: the cowboy pilot who rides a nuclear bomb like a rodeo bull, waving his hat and hollering "yeehaw!" on the way down. iconic.

3. hilarious scenes:
• war room antics: imagine a bunch of world leaders in a high-stakes meeting, but they're acting like kids in a playground fight. "gentlemen, you can't fight in here! this is the war room!"
• phone call with the soviet premier: the president has to call the soviet leader to explain they accidentally sent a nuke their way. it's like the world's worst customer service call.

4. themes: the film is a satire, so it's poking fun at the absurdity of war, the ridiculousness of human error, and the terrifying power of nuclear weapons. it's a laugh-so-you-don't-cry kind of deal.

an italian marxist thinker who sought answers to the questions, "why hasn't the revolution karl marx envisioned happened?" and "where did marx go wrong?" and found the answer in the middle class.

according to gramsci, marx overlooked the middle class. a revolution can only be carried out by those who have nothing to lose. however, the middle class has things to lose. at the very least, they have hopes and dreams for the future. because of this, they are unlikely to risk rebelling against the system in order to protect what they have. history shows that they have not done so.