the device is too small!

cherry picking

the fisherman of halicarnassus · 2022-12-30T17:07:36.311484-08:00

cherry picking is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument relies on the selective use of evidence or examples in order to support a particular conclusion, while ignoring or dismissing evidence or examples that contradict or weaken the argument. this can create a misleading or distorted view of the subject being discussed, as it presents a biased or incomplete picture of the available evidence. here is an example of an argument that relies on cherry picking: premise: all democrats are socialists. example: bernie sanders is a socialist and a democrat. conclusion: all democrats are socialists. in this argument, the premise is supported by the example of bernie sanders, who is both a socialist and a democrat. however, this example ignores the fact that there are many other democrats who are not socialists, and therefore does not provide a complete or accurate picture of the relationship between democrats and socialism. as a result, the conclusion of the argument is based on a biased or incomplete view of the evidence. another example of cherry picking might be: premise: vaccines are dangerous. example: some people who have received vaccines have experienced serious side effects. conclusion: vaccines are dangerous. in this argument, the premise is supported by the example of some people who have experienced serious side effects after receiving vaccines. however, this example ignores the vast majority of people who have received vaccines without experiencing any serious side effects, and therefore does not provide a complete or accurate picture of the risks and benefits of vaccines. as a result, the conclusion of the argument is based on a biased or incomplete view of the evidence. in order to avoid cherry picking, it is important to consider all of the available evidence and examples, rather than selectively choosing only those that support a particular conclusion. this can help to ensure that the argument is based on a balanced and accurate view of the evidence, rather than relying on a biased or incomplete picture of the subject being discussed.

[links]

top: all | today

no suitable entries were found with the criteria you specified.

show all (1 entry)