flaminm

world war 3 on the internet.

it is now the worst buyout for banks since the financial crisis. the wall street journal

it will completely erase shared culture.

in the '80s and '90s, people more or less watched and listened to the same things. the next day, they would discuss and critique these in the office or at school, sharing their thoughts with friends. with the widespread adoption of social media, instead of a collective culture, a niche culture that only followers are aware of has started to emerge. someone might become famous somewhere, but you don't know who they are, right? yet, they have hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions of followers.

with the advent of artificial intelligence, this niche culture will be replaced by a completely "personalized culture." for example, think about spotify. you have marked the songs you like one by one. with the development of ais that produce good music, songs created specifically for you based on your preferences will start to play. no one else will know about them. you can extend this to films, series, and other types of content. thus, everyone will be exposed to what they like. in a way, it's good, but in another, it's bad. in the end, everything will become more individualized. there will be no common ground for sharing.

if i live long enough, i would love to see a high-quality ai that allows me to choose the actors in a film made just for me.

aldous huxley's dystopian novel published in 1932 has been the subject of debate since its release: is "brave new world" a dystopia or a utopia? to understand the genre of the novel properly, it's essential to look at the characteristics of dystopian fiction:

– the use of propaganda to control society
– restrictions on access to information, freedom, and independence
– society's adulation of a symbolic leader or concept
– society constantly feeling under surveillance
– society's fear of the outside world
– society living in dehumanized systems
– alienation from and disbelief in nature
– society conforming to the same expectations, resulting in a lack of individuality and diversity
– society being a reflection of a perfect utopia

huxley's novel exhibits all but one of these characteristics. the bokanovsky process and fordism in "brave new world" serve as tools of propaganda to maintain control. the book's representative of these themes is the western european world controller, mustapha mond. throughout the book, we see bans on science and art, and nobody is truly free. there's worship of the concept of fordism. you witness the fear of lenina crowne when she visits the savage reservation with john, who represents the outside world. the characters perfectly conform to the system, indicating the dehumanization of the established order. emotions, pain, or freedoms are absent; instead, they are replaced with sensory films and "soma," a drug they never part without. the isolation of john's place, the savage reservation, is an example of the exclusion of nature. characters are divided into classes, and each class is standardized. lastly, the book gives an air of utopia. except for the characters feeling under surveillance, the book perfectly encompasses dystopian elements.

the real issue, though, is huxley's choice of a soft dystopia over a harsh one. unlike 1984, where political oppression crushes society, "brave new world" offers its society a "false" happiness. this is what baffles readers and gives a sense of utopia: the characters are happy, but this happiness is tied to the system shaping them from birth and their frequent use of the drug soma.

in the novel, there is a robotic caste system: people are pre-programmed before birth as alphas, betas, gammas, deltas, or epsilons. alphas are tall, intelligent, and attractive, while deltas are short, programmed for labor, and stupid, with the intelligence of a five-year-old at most. thus, the lower classes, the deltas, and epsilons, are happy.

in essence, huxley has killed the concept of "human" and replaced it with "human-like robots," creating a utopia-looking dystopia. huxley's message is that it's impossible for humans to create a utopia on their own. if stability and order are desired, personalities must be killed and people must become dependent on drugs. the book lacks art, family, emotions, books, freedom of thought, or science. these are things that the system opposes because a robot does not need these concepts.

like "1984," "brave new world" contains a totalitarian regime, but instead of using torture like room 101, it aligns its characters with soft methods like the bokanovsky system and soma, yet the result is the same: society loses its freedom. the utopia "brave new world" provides is not for people but for humans who have lost their human traits. this is why huxley includes a character like john the savage. john represents "the human" in every sentence and action against the robotic system. what he tries to convey is that either we live in fake happiness as the system intends, or we feel real happiness like john, but with its pains.

in the sixteenth chapter, the conversation between john and mustapha mond mentions that they have given up science and art (or, in other words, their humanity) for stability and happiness.

huxley's model of utopia is a system cleansed of humanity. he does not envision a perfect political structure or educated people like thomas more, but a system that eradicates the self. that's why "brave new world" is a dystopia. replacing tyranny with happiness does not change the fact that it annihilates the human self.

as stated in the adaptation of the host, which also has a utopic dystopia like "brave new world," "our world had never been so perfect, but it was no longer our world."

imagine this guy named chad who thinks he knows everything. he's got this unshakeable confidence, and he just can't resist explaining things, especially to women, even when they already know it—or worse, when they're experts. that's mansplaining in a nutshell.

picture tech savvy tammy, a software engineer with a decade of experience. chad, who just read a beginner's guide to coding, starts telling her how to write a basic program. tammy's internal monologue is probably something like, "thanks, chad. i only do this for a living."

then there's fitness fiona, a personal trainer. she's at the gym, working out, and chad strolls over to show her the 'correct' way to do a squat. fiona's response is a polite smile, but inside, she's imagining hitting chad with a kettlebell.

or take history buff hannah, who has a ph.d. in history. at a party, chad starts explaining world war ii to her as if she's never heard of it. hannah nods along, all the while thinking, "is this guy for real?"

and don't forget guitar goddess gwen, who's been playing guitar for fifteen years and is in a band. chad, who just picked up a guitar last week, starts showing her how to play a chord. gwen's like, "oh really, chad? tell me more about this g chord."

the best part about mansplaining is chad's unshakeable belief that he's bestowing valuable knowledge upon the unenlightened. meanwhile, the women on the receiving end are caught between wanting to laugh and wanting to sigh deeply.

so, mansplaining is when a guy explains something in a condescending way to a woman, assuming she doesn't know it, even if she's an expert. it's like chad believes it's his duty to educate everyone, even when they don't need—or want—his 'wisdom.'

mclean v. arkansas was a landmark legal case in 1981 where u.s. district court judge william r. overton ruled against the state of arkansas regarding its law mandating the teaching of "creation science" as an alternative to evolution in public schools. the case, officially known as mclean v. arkansas board of education, represented a significant confrontation between science and religion in the educational sphere.

the arkansas law required that public schools give equal time to creation science and evolution whenever evolutionary theory was taught. plaintiffs, including teachers, parents, and religious leaders, challenged the law's constitutionality, arguing that it violated the establishment clause of the first amendment, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or unduly favoring one religion over another.

judge overton's decision was pivotal for several reasons:

scientific scrutiny and definition: the trial provided a forum to scrutinize and define what constitutes science. overton concluded that creation science failed to meet the essential characteristics of science, such as relying on testable hypotheses, and was therefore inherently religious.

legal precedents: the ruling reinforced the application of the "lemon test" from the supreme court's decision in lemon v. kurtzman (1971), which assesses the constitutionality of state laws in light of the establishment clause. overton determined that the arkansas law had a clear religious intent, advanced a particular religious belief, and entangled the state with religion, failing all three prongs of the lemon test.

impact on education: this decision had a profound impact on how science and theories of origin are taught in schools across the united states. it helped affirm the importance of maintaining a secular approach in science education, focusing on scientific facts, theories, and methodologies rather than religious doctrines.

cultural and religious debate: mclean v. arkansas also highlighted the ongoing cultural and religious debates regarding the teaching of evolution, sparking discussions about academic freedom, the role of religion in public spaces, and the nature of science and education.

the napoleonic code, officially known as the "code civil des français," is a comprehensive body of civil law instituted under napoleon bonaparte in 1804. this legal code was one of the most significant influences on the practice of law in the modern world, embodying a systematic approach to civil law that contrasted sharply with the feudal laws that had been common in european countries.

the napoleonic code laid the groundwork for legal systems in many parts of the world, largely due to its coherent structure and the revolutionary principles it endorsed. the code abolished feudal privileges and established the principles of civil liberty, equality before the law, and the secular character of the state. it emphasized the protection of private property, simplified the legal system, and made laws clearer and more accessible, allowing citizens to understand their rights and obligations easily.

key aspects of the napoleonic code include:

property rights: the code established that property rights could be freely bought, sold, and bequeathed, a significant shift from the inheritance laws of feudal times.

family law: it set down rules for marriage, divorce, and the rights of children, including the equal division of assets.

contract law: the code outlined how contracts should be formed and enforced, emphasizing the importance of mutual consent and obligations.

civil rights: it codified civil rights in a manner that applied uniformly to all citizens, thereby standardizing legal processes across france.

the napoleonic code has had a profound influence on the development of civil law jurisdictions worldwide, serving as a model for countries across europe, latin america, the middle east, and parts of africa. its adoption marked a fundamental break from the inconsistent and complicated legal customs that had previously prevailed in france, making a significant step toward the rationalization and democratization of the law. this set of laws is considered a monumental achievement in the history of legal systems and continues to be studied and revered in the field of comparative law.

have you ever walked past a building with a broken window and thought nothing of it? according to the broken windows theory introduced by james q. wilson and george l. kelling in 1982, such minor signs of disorder could lead to bigger issues if ignored. let's explore how this fascinating theory has shaped urban spaces and policing strategies!

what is the broken windows theory?
the theory suggests that a single unchecked broken window can signal neglect, leading to more broken windows and escalating to serious crimes. the idea? small problems can snowball into big chaos if not addressed promptly!

real-world impact
policing in new york city: in the 1990s, nyc police commissioner william bratton and mayor rudy giuliani applied this theory city-wide. by cracking down on minor crimes like graffiti and turnstile jumping, they saw a notable decrease in both minor and major crimes, illustrating the theory's potential in reducing urban crime.
transit authority in new york: the nyc transit authority took a rigorous approach to minor offenses such as fare evasion and quickly cleaning graffiti from subway cars. this commitment to maintaining order was followed by a decrease in more serious crimes within the subway system, showcasing the theory's application in a specific public environment.

criticisms and controversies
while influential, the broken windows theory has faced criticism for potentially leading to aggressive policing of minor offenses, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. additionally, some argue that other factors like economic improvements may also play a significant role in crime reduction, challenging the direct impact of the theory.

broader impact on urban spaces
beyond policing, the theory influences urban planning and community programs aiming to improve environments and maintain public spaces. efforts such as community cleanups and public art projects not only enhance aesthetic appeal but also foster community pride and deter crime.

the broken windows theory offers a compelling lens on how small acts of maintenance and care in our environments can prevent larger societal issues. as we continue to evolve our urban spaces, the insights from this theory encourage proactive measures to ensure safe and vibrant communities.

the 2023 israel-hamas war, also referred to as "operation iron swords" by israel, and as the "battle of seif al-quds" by hamas, marked a significant and deadly escalation in the long-standing israeli-palestinian conflict. this conflict has deep historical roots, primarily revolving around territorial, national, and religious disputes between israelis and palestinians.

the immediate events leading to the war began on october 7, 2023, when hamas launched a large-scale attack on southern israel from the gaza strip. this attack involved gunmen entering israeli territory, resulting in significant casualties and hostages being taken back to gaza. in response, israel launched extensive military airstrikes and a ground invasion aimed at neutralizing hamas' military capabilities and recovering hostages.

historically, the gaza strip has been a focal point of conflict. hamas, which governs gaza, is designated as a terrorist organization by israel, the united states, and the european union, among others. it took control of gaza in 2007, following its victory in the 2006 palestinian legislative elections and subsequent conflicts with the fatah party. the israeli government has since imposed blockades on gaza, citing the need to limit hamas' ability to arm itself. these blockades, coupled with repeated cycles of conflict, have led to significant humanitarian issues in gaza.

the broader historical context includes the establishment of israel in 1948, subsequent arab-israeli wars, and ongoing disputes over territories and the rights of palestinians and israelis. various peace efforts over the decades, including the oslo accords in the 1990s, have attempted to address these issues but have largely failed to achieve a lasting resolution.

the 2023 conflict has been marked by extensive military operations, significant casualties on both sides, and widespread international concern over the humanitarian impact, particularly in gaza. efforts by other countries and international organizations to mediate have continued, but the situation remains highly volatile and deeply complex.

a fitness program that combines constantly varied functional movements performed at high intensity.

here are some tips for becoming competitive in crossfit:

train consistently. aim to train at least four times per week, and preferably five or six times per week.

focus on your technique. it is important to learn the proper technique for all of the crossfit movements before you start trying to lift heavy weights or perform complex skills.

listen to your body. don't be afraid to scale back workouts or take days off when you need to.

eat a healthy diet. eating a nutritious diet will help you to recover from workouts and build muscle.
get enough sleep. sleep is essential for muscle recovery and overall fitness.

in my opinion.

aka truth serum. allegedly, it was used by secret service experts to make prisoners speak during corporal punishment. bbc's journalist* took it to show its effects. video

buying the louisiana territory raised a constitutional issue for president jefferson, since the document said nothing about purchasing new lands. jefferson decided that keeping france from controlling the mississippi river was too important, though, to turn down the opportunity. so the purchase was judged necessary and the senate readily approved it in 1803. congress paid france about $15 million for the land.

the louisiana purchase doubled the land area of the nation, adding 800,000 square miles and more than 200,000 people-primarily american indians, spanish, and french.

everything gets less complicated if you think love is just "a hormonal reaction".*

let's see what notable people said about love:

theodor seuss geisel:
you know you're in love when you can't fall asleep because reality is finally better than your dreams.

taylor swift:
when you are missing someone, time seems to move slower, and when i'm falling in love with someone, time seems to be moving faster.

kim kardashian:
i think you have different soul-mates throughout your life, that your soul needs different things at different times. i do believe in love. i will always believe in love, but my idea has changed from what i've always thought.

oprah winfrey:
lots of people want to ride with you in the limo. but you want someone who'll help you catch the bus.

william watson purkey:
you've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
love like you'll never be hurt,
sing like there's nobody listening,
and live like it's heaven on earth.

elie wiesel:
the opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. the opposite of art is not ugliness, it's indifference. the opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. and the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference.

william shakespeare:
love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.

neil gaiman:
have you ever been in love? horrible isn't it? it makes you so vulnerable. it opens your chest and it opens up your heart and it means that someone can get inside you and mess you up.

lao tzu:
being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage.

chuck palahniuk:
the one you love and the one who loves you are never, ever the same person.*

paulo coelho:
when we love, we always strive to become better than we are. when we strive to become better than we are, everything around us becomes better too.

one is loved because one is loved. no reason is needed for loving.

mahatma gandhi:
when i despair, i remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. there have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. think of it, always.

where there is love there is life.

sarah dessen:
love is needing someone. love is putting up with someone's bad qualities because they somehow complete you.

oscar wilde:
never love anyone who treats you like you're ordinary.*

plato:
every heart sings a song, incomplete, until another heart whispers back. those who wish to sing always find a song. at the touch of a lover, everyone becomes a poet.

john krasinski:
when you're lucky enough to meet your one person, then life takes a turn for the best. it can't get better than that.

katy perry:
first and foremost, self-love, and then give love away.

fyodor dostoevsky:
above all, don't lie to yourself. the man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others. and having no respect he ceases to love.

edgar allen poe:
we loved with a love that was more than love.

sigmund freud:
psychoanalysis is in essence a cure through love.

i am hodling