the fisherman of halicarnassus

crossfit is a popular high-intensity fitness program that combines elements of weightlifting, cardio exercises, and gymnastics. it has gained prominence due to its focus on functional movements, varied workouts, and community atmosphere.

after awhile you could get used to anything.

when you reach the top of the hill, you will see bodrum.
don't assume that you will leave as you came.
others before you were the same too.
as they departed, they all left their souls behind.
image image

pooh-pooh is a term that refers to the act of dismissing or belittling something as being unworthy of serious consideration or attention. it can also refer to the act of expressing contempt or disdain for something.

for example, someone might pooh-pooh an idea or suggestion by saying "that's a ridiculous idea" or "that's not worth considering." this can be done in a dismissive or contemptuous tone of voice, and it conveys the idea that the person believes the idea or suggestion is not worth considering or discussing.

another example of pooh-pooh might be someone who dismisses a concern or issue as being insignificant or unimportant. for example, someone might pooh-pooh a concern about climate change by saying "it's just a natural cycle" or "it's not a big deal." this can be done in a dismissive or contemptuous tone of voice, and it conveys the idea that the person believes the concern is not worth considering or addressing.

in order to avoid pooh-poohing something, it is important to consider all ideas, concerns, and issues with an open and respectful mindset, rather than dismissing or belittling them without careful consideration. this can help to create a more open and respectful dialogue, and it can encourage people to consider a wide range of perspectives and viewpoints.

fallacies are mistakes in reasoning or arguments that are based on incorrect or flawed logic. there are many different types of fallacies, and they can occur in written or oral arguments. it is important to be aware of fallacies in order to critically evaluate arguments and make informed decisions, and to avoid using fallacies in your own arguments.

chernobyl's new spin off documentary that will be coming to hbo and hbo max later june 2022.

john stuart mill, a 19th century philosopher and political economist, is best known for his work on the concept of liberty, particularly freedom of speech. in his essay on liberty, mill argues that individuals should be free to express their ideas and opinions without fear of censorship or punishment, as long as their speech does not harm others.

according to mill, the primary reason for protecting freedom of speech is that it allows for the exchange of ideas and the free flow of information. this, in turn, allows people to form their own opinions and make informed decisions. without the ability to freely express and explore different viewpoints, individuals would be unable to challenge and question the status quo, leading to a stagnant and intellectually stagnant society.

mill also believed that freedom of speech serves as a safeguard against the abuse of power. when people are able to openly criticize and express their opinions about those in positions of power, it helps to hold those individuals accountable and prevent them from becoming tyrannical.

however, mill recognized that there are limits to freedom of speech. he argued that the harm principle should be applied to speech, meaning that speech should not be restricted unless it causes harm to others. for example, speech that incites violence or causes direct harm to an individual's reputation should be restricted.

overall, mill's belief in the importance of freedom of speech has had a significant impact on modern ideas about individual liberty and the role of government in regulating speech. his ideas continue to be debated and discussed by philosophers and policymakers today.

ochlocracy, also known as mob rule, is a form of government in which control is exercised by an unruly mob or by a mass of people lacking the necessary skills and knowledge to govern effectively. this term is often used to describe a situation in which a government is controlled by people who are not elected to office, but instead are members of a mob who act impulsively and without regard for the laws and regulations of the state.

historically, ochlocracy has been associated with some of the earliest forms of democracy in ancient greece, particularly in athens, where the people had a direct say in the running of the city-state through the institution of the popular assembly. however, this system of government was also prone to mob rule and was often marked by outbreaks of violence and chaos. in these early democracies, there was no clear separation of powers or system of checks and balances to prevent the mob from exercising control over the government.

in modern times, the term ochlocracy is often used to describe situations in which the mob exercises control over the government through street demonstrations, riots, and other forms of public unrest. this can occur in both democratic and authoritarian regimes and is often a result of a failure of governance, widespread poverty and inequality, or widespread public discontent with the ruling authorities. in some cases, ochlocracy can also be a result of outside interference by other states or non-state actors who seek to destabilize a government and exert control over its population.

in conclusion, ochlocracy is a form of government that is marked by mob rule and the lack of effective governance. throughout history, it has often been associated with early forms of democracy and has been seen as a result of a failure of governance or widespread public discontent.

english philosopher. "the right thing to do, the just thing to do is to maximize utility."

"the moral side of murder" is a well-known thought experiment that combines elements of game theory and philosophy to explore ethical dilemmas. it's often used to discuss the tension between moral principles and rational decision-making in a hypothetical scenario. let's break down the components and implications of this thought experiment:

scenario:
imagine you are a participant in a game where you and another person are given the opportunity to make a decision that affects both of your lives. the scenario is structured as follows:

– you and the other person each have the option to either cooperate or betray.
– if both of you choose to cooperate, you both receive a moderate reward (let's say 2 points each).
– if you choose to betray while the other person cooperates, you will receive a substantial reward (let's say 4 points), but the other person will suffer a severe consequence (let's say -4 points).
– if both of you choose to betray, you both receive a small reward (let's say 1 point each).

game theory perspective:
from a game theory standpoint, this scenario is reminiscent of the classic prisoner's dilemma game. in the prisoner's dilemma, two individuals face a similar choice: cooperate with each other or betray the other. the dilemma arises because each player's optimal choice depends on the choice made by the other player.

in "the moral side of murder," if we assume that the participants are solely focused on maximizing their rewards, the rational choice would be to betray, regardless of the other person's choice. this is because the payoff for betraying is always higher than cooperating, no matter what the other person does.

philosophical implications:
from a philosophical perspective, this thought experiment raises important questions about ethics, morality, and the clash between self-interest and moral principles. it prompts considerations such as:

utilitarianism vs. deontology: participants must decide whether to prioritize their personal gain (utilitarianism) or adhere to a moral principle of not causing harm to others (deontology). choosing to betray maximizes personal gain but may involve causing harm to another person.

consequences of actions: the scenario highlights the potential consequences of one's actions on others. participants must weigh the immediate benefits against the harm they might cause.

social contracts: this thought experiment can be seen as a reflection of social contracts in society. it asks whether individuals would choose to act in ways that promote the well-being of the collective, even if it means sacrificing some personal gain.

integrity and trust: the choices made by participants reveal their willingness to uphold trust and integrity. cooperating reflects a commitment to working together, while betraying erodes trust and damages relationships.

the concept of zero as a number has a long and interesting history. it is thought to have originated in ancient civilizations in mesopotamia, india, and the maya civilization in central america.

in ancient mesopotamia, the sumerians used a symbol for a placeholder in their system of base 60, which is still used in time measurement today (e.g. 60 seconds in a minute). this placeholder symbol was later adopted by the ancient babylonians and is thought to be the earliest recorded use of a placeholder symbol in a positional number system.

in ancient india, the concept of zero as a number was developed independently by the ancient indian mathematicians. they used the sanskrit word "shunya," which means "void," to represent the concept of nothingness. the ancient indian mathematician brahmagupta was the first to write about the rules for arithmetic with zero, including the concept of negative numbers.

the maya civilization in central america also had a concept of zero, which they represented with a shell-shaped symbol. the mayan number system was based on a base 20 system and included a symbol for zero, which was used in the same way that we use zero today.

the concept of zero as a number was later transmitted to the islamic world, where it was further developed by mathematicians like al-khwarizmi and later spread to europe through the work of scholars like fibonacci. today, zero is an integral part of the modern decimal number system, which is used worldwide.

after world war ii, many nazis and collaborators fled europe to escape trial for war crimes. surprisingly, some of them found refuge in the united states. there were a few different ways this happened.

operation paperclip: this was a secret program in which the u.s. government recruited scientists from nazi germany to work on america's behalf during the cold war. these scientists, some of whom were alleged to have ties to nazi war crimes, were invaluable assets due to their advanced knowledge in rocketry, medicine, and other fields. perhaps the most famous of these was wernher von braun, a former member of the nazi party who played a key role in developing the v-2 rocket during wwii and later became an integral part of nasa's moon landing program.

intelligence use: the u.s., like many nations during the cold war, was focused on gathering as much intelligence as possible to gain an edge over the soviet union. some former nazis and collaborators were used as spies or informants, despite their criminal pasts.

immigration: some nazis managed to immigrate to the u.s., often hiding their past affiliations. they lived in the country for decades, typically maintaining a low profile. many were later tracked down and prosecuted or deported, particularly after the formation of the office of special investigations (osi) in 1979, a unit of the department of justice tasked with identifying and expelling former nazis.

it's important to note that the presence of nazis and collaborators in the u.s. after wwii has been a source of controversy. these events have been subject to numerous investigations and have led to changes in u.s. policies regarding war criminals and immigration. as of my knowledge cutoff in september 2021, these efforts to hold former nazis accountable continued, even as the number of surviving wwii-era nazis dwindled.

cratylism is the belief that the words or names that we use for things accurately reflect the true nature of those things. this belief is based on the idea that words have an inherent meaning that is intrinsic to the things they represent, and that this meaning is somehow encoded in the structure or sound of the word itself.

one example of cratylism might be the belief that the word "dog" accurately reflects the true nature of dogs, because the word itself contains some inherent meaning that corresponds to the characteristics of dogs. for example, some proponents of cratylism might argue that the word "dog" contains the sound "d-o-g," which represents the barking sound that dogs make, or that the word "dog" is derived from an ancient word that means "protector" or "guardian," which reflects the role that dogs often play as protective companions.

another example of cratylism might be the belief that the word "tree" accurately reflects the true nature of trees, because the word itself contains some inherent meaning that corresponds to the characteristics of trees. for example, some proponents of cratylism might argue that the word "tree" is derived from an ancient word that means "life," which reflects the role that trees play in supporting and sustaining life on earth.

in practice, however, cratylism is generally considered to be a flawed or unscientific approach to understanding the meaning and use of words. most modern linguists and philosophers reject the idea that words have an inherent meaning that is intrinsic to the things they represent, and instead view the meaning of words as a social or cultural construct that is shaped by the way that they are used and understood by speakers of a particular language.

gerrymandering is the practice of manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to favor one political party or group over another. this can be done in various ways, such as packing voters of one party into a single district, cracking the supporters of a particular party across multiple districts or shifting the boundaries in a way that benefits a particular candidate or party.

for example, let's say a state has a population of 50% democrats and 50% republicans. if the party in power redraws the district lines in a way that packs all the democrats into a few districts and spreads out the republicans over the remaining districts, they can essentially ensure that their party wins a majority of the seats in that state, even though they don't have a majority of the overall votes.

another example of gerrymandering is racial gerrymandering, which involves redistricting in a way that diminishes the voting power of racial or ethnic minorities. for instance, if a state has a large population of latino voters, and the district boundaries are redrawn in a way that divides them across multiple districts, their voting power is diluted and their ability to elect a representative who truly represents their interests is severely impacted.

gerrymandering can have significant consequences for the political process, including reduced competition, decreased voter turnout, and the disenfranchisement of minority voters. it can also lead to the election of representatives who are not truly representative of the interests of their constituents.

efforts to combat gerrymandering include initiatives like independent redistricting commissions, which aim to take the power of redistricting out of the hands of politicians and ensure that districts are drawn fairly and with the best interests of voters in mind.

in summary, gerrymandering is a practice that involves manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to benefit a particular political party or group, often at the expense of minority groups or fair representation. efforts to combat gerrymandering aim to promote fair and competitive elections and ensure that districts are drawn in a way that truly reflects the will of the people.

"ars longa, vita brevis" is a latin phrase meaning "art is long, life is short." the phrase is often attributed to the ancient greek physician hippocrates, although it is not found in any of his writings. the phrase is often interpreted as a reminder that the pursuit of one's craft or art takes a long time, but that life is short, and one should make the most of it while they can.

it is also interpreted as an encouragement to persist and to invest time in one's passion or vocation, even if it takes a long time to master it. it also implies that one should not give up on their passion and dreams, as the journey of pursuing them is worth it, even if the time is limited.

in general, the phrase is a reminder to appreciate the beauty and value of the creative process, and to make the most of the time we have in this world.