Thumb Up Thumb Down Attach media

recently voted (82) - page 3

navigate to the topic list
  • straw man

    this is an argument that misrepresents an opponent's position in order to make it easier to attack. for example, "those who support gun control want to take away all guns, including hunting rifles and shotguns."

  • false cause

    this is an argument that suggests that one event is the cause of another event, without sufficient evidence to support the claim. for example, "i wore my lucky socks and won the game, so the socks must have brought me luck."

  • appeal to ignorance

    this is an argument that asserts that a claim must be true because it has not been proven false, or vice versa. for example, "there is no evidence that aliens don't exist, so they must exist."

  • red herring

    this is an argument that introduces a new topic in order to distract from the original issue being discussed. for example, "yes, i know i'm late for work again, but have you seen how bad the traffic is this morning?"

  • appeal to authority

    this is an argument that relies on the credibility or expertise of a person or organization to support a claim, without providing any evidence to back it up. for example, "the ceo of a major pharmaceutical company says that their new drug is completely safe, so it must be true."

  • false dilemma

    this is an argument that presents two options as the only possibilities, when in reality there may be more options available. for example, "you either support the war or you're unpatriotic."

  • slippery slope

    the slippery slope is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument suggests that a small initial action or event will inevitably lead to a chain of other events, culminating in a significant, negative consequence. this type of argument suggests that if the initial action is allowed to happen, it will set off a chain reaction that cannot be stopped, ultimately leading to an undesirable outcome.

    for example, consider the following argument:

    "if we allow students to use their phones in class, it will lead to students being constantly distracted and unable to pay attention. this will result in lower grades and a decrease in overall academic performance. therefore, we should not allow students to use their phones in class."

    in this argument, the initial action of allowing students to use their phones in class is presented as the first step in a chain of events that will ultimately lead to negative consequences. however, this argument does not take into account the possibility that students might be able to use their phones responsibly or that other measures could be put in place to prevent distractions.

    one key problem with the slippery slope fallacy is that it often relies on exaggerated or unrealistic assumptions about the consequences of an action. it is important to carefully evaluate the evidence and consider alternative explanations when confronted with this type of argument.

    in critical thinking, it is important to be aware of the slippery slope fallacy and to carefully consider the evidence and logic behind an argument, rather than simply accepting it because it seems to follow a logical sequence of events. it is also important to consider alternative explanations and to be open to the possibility that the initial action or event may not necessarily lead to the negative consequences that are being predicted.

  • rhetoric (aristotle)

    aristotle's rhetoric is a theory of communication that was developed by the ancient greek philosopher aristotle. it is based on the idea that effective communication requires understanding the audience, the speaker's goals, and the context in which the communication takes place.

    there are three main elements of aristotle's rhetoric:

    ethos: this refers to the credibility or character of the speaker. a speaker with a strong ethos is more likely to be trusted and believed by the audience.
    pathos: this refers to the emotional appeal of the argument. a speaker who can appeal to the emotions of the audience is more likely to persuade them.
    logos: this refers to the logical appeal of the argument. a speaker who presents a well-reasoned, logical argument is more likely to persuade the audience.

    to win an argument using aristotle's rhetoric, it is important to consider these elements and try to establish your own credibility, appeal to the emotions of the audience, and present a logical argument.

    here are some examples of how to use aristotle's rhetoric to win an argument:

    – establish your credibility: if you are an expert on the topic you are discussing, make sure to highlight your qualifications and experience. this will help to build your ethos and make your argument more persuasive.
    – appeal to emotions: try to connect with your audience on an emotional level. this could involve sharing personal stories or using anecdotes to illustrate your point.
    –use logic: make sure to present a well-reasoned, logical argument. use evidence to support your points and address any counterarguments.

    by considering these elements of aristotle's rhetoric, you can craft a persuasive argument that is more likely to be effective in winning over your audience.

  • ad hominem

    ad hominem is a type of argument where someone attacks or criticizes the person making an argument, rather than the argument itself. this is often done in an attempt to undermine the person's credibility or character, rather than focusing on the merits of their argument.

    here are some examples of ad hominem:

    "you can't trust what he says about politics because he's a convicted criminal."
    "she can't be right about the environment because she works for a big oil company."
    "he's just saying that because he's trying to be popular."
    in each of these examples, the person making the argument is attacked or criticized, rather than the argument itself being discussed. this can be a logical fallacy because it doesn't address the substance of the argument and can be used to distract from a discussion of the issue at hand.

  • range anxiety

    range anxiety is a term used to describe the fear that electric vehicles will run out of power before reaching their destination. this fear can be a barrier to the adoption of electric cars, as many people are concerned that they will not be able to find a charging station when they need one.

    one humorous way to explain range anxiety is to compare it to the "quarter panic" that some people experience when using a payphone. just like with a payphone, electric car owners may worry that they will not have enough "juice" to make it to their destination. however, just like with a payphone, there are ways to mitigate this anxiety, such as by planning ahead and checking for charging stations along the route. and just like with a payphone, range anxiety may soon be a thing of the past as technology and infrastructure continue to improve.

  • freedom of speech

    freedom of speech, or the ability to freely express one's thoughts and opinions, was a concept that was explored by several ancient greek philosophers.

    one of the earliest philosophers to discuss freedom of speech was socrates, who believed in the importance of questioning and challenging established beliefs and ideas. socrates believed that the pursuit of truth and knowledge was more important than the fear of offending others, and he famously stood by his beliefs even in the face of persecution and death.

    other ancient greek philosophers, such as plato and aristotle, also recognized the value of free expression and the importance of allowing individuals to engage in open and honest dialogue. plato, in particular, argued that the ability to freely express one's thoughts was essential for the functioning of a just society.

    however, it's worth noting that the concept of freedom of speech as we understand it today was not fully developed in ancient greece. in fact, many ancient greek philosophers believed that certain forms of speech, such as blasphemy or treason, should be restricted. nonetheless, the ideas of socrates and other ancient greek philosophers laid the foundation for modern ideas about the importance of freedom of speech and the value of open and honest dialogue.

  • cash crop

    a cash crop is a type of agricultural crop that is grown specifically for sale in the market, rather than for personal use or subsistence. cash crops are typically grown on a large scale and are an important source of income for many farmers around the world. the cultivation of cash crops has a long history, dating back to ancient civilizations.

    some examples of cash crops that have been grown for centuries include:

    wheat: wheat has been grown for thousands of years and is one of the oldest and most important cereal crops in the world. it is grown in many parts of the world, including europe, asia, and the americas.

    cotton: cotton is a cash crop that has been cultivated for thousands of years in the middle east, india, and china. it is an important source of fiber for clothing and textiles.

    sugar: sugar cane is a tropical cash crop that has been grown in the caribbean, south america, and southeast asia for centuries. it is an important source of sugar, which is used in a variety of food and beverage products.

    tobacco: tobacco is a cash crop that has been grown in the americas for centuries. it is used in the production of cigarettes and other tobacco products.

    coffee: coffee is a cash crop that has been grown in tropical regions of the world for hundreds of years. it is an important source of income for many farmers and is used to produce a popular beverage.

    tea: tea is another cash crop that has a long history of cultivation. it is grown in many parts of the world, including asia, africa, and south america, and is used to produce a popular beverage.

    overall, the cultivation of cash crops has played a significant role in the economic development of many regions around the world.

  • london bridge is down

    the queen's death will kick off 'operation london bridge', which is a meticulously drawn up plan to deal with the eventuality of the death of the head of the state.

    first set up in the 1960s, the plan of action was meant to be followed for 10 days after the monarch's death and has been revised several times over the years.

    among other things, the plan was aimed at ensuring a smooth transition of prince charles* to the throne. according to the protocol, he will officially be announced as the king a day after the demise of her majesty.

  • sobiyet

    sobiyet is a traditional turkish dessert made of phyllo dough filled with cream or a mixture of crushed nuts and sweetened with syrup or honey. it is similar to baklava, another traditional turkish pastry made with layers of phyllo dough and a filling of nuts, but sobiyet is typically made with a circular shape and a filling of cream rather than nuts.

    the word "sobiyet" is believed to be derived from the persian word "şöb," which means "cream." this refers to the creamy filling that is used in sobiyet. the dessert is believed to have originated in the ottoman empire and has a long history in turkish cuisine.

    to make sobiyet, thin layers of phyllo dough are layered in a circular pan and then filled with a creamy filling made of milk, sugar, and cornstarch or flour. the layers of dough and filling are then baked until the phyllo is crisp and golden brown. once baked, the sobiyet is drizzled with a syrup made with sugar, water, and sometimes lemon juice or rosewater.

    sobiyet is a popular dessert in turkey and is often served at celebrations and special occasions. it is also a popular street food and can be found at bakeries and cafes throughout the country. it is typically served in small slices and is often garnished with a sprinkle of powdered sugar or a dusting of ground nuts.

  • human zoo

    human zoos, also known as "ethnographic expositions" or "human exhibitions," were a form of entertainment that featured live displays of human beings, often from non-western cultures, as a way of showcasing their perceived differences from western society. these exhibitions were popular in europe and the united states in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and were often presented as a way of educating the public about different cultures and societies.

    the history of human zoos can be traced back to the 18th century, when european explorers and colonizers brought back specimens of exotic animals and plants from their travels to be displayed in zoos and museums. in the 19th century, these exhibitions began to include human beings as well, often in a way that was degrading and demeaning.

    one of the first recorded human zoos was the "negro village" exhibition at the 1878 world's fair in paris, which featured a group of people from dahomey (now benin) in west africa who were displayed in a village-like setting. this exhibition was followed by others in europe and the united states, including the "indians of north america" exhibit at the 1893 world's fair in chicago, which featured native americans from various tribes living in replicas of their traditional dwellings.

    human zoos became increasingly popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and were often used as a way of reinforcing racial and cultural stereotypes and presenting non-western cultures as inferior to western society. these exhibitions were widely criticized for their dehumanizing and degrading treatment of the people on display, and for the way they perpetuated harmful stereotypes and prejudices.

    in the mid-20th century, human zoos began to fall out of favor as attitudes towards race and culture began to change and people became more aware of the harm they caused. today, human zoos are generally considered to be a deeply troubling and unethical aspect of the history of colonialism and racial discrimination, and they are widely condemned as a form of exploitation and dehumanization.

« / 6 »