cuteroid

has the hottest girls on campus.

research and investment area for billionaires.

he has just become a free agent!

it looks like he ended an era. he is about to transfer to manchester city. so, he could move to partner club new york fc in the future.

things are getting messi...

accused of promoting pedophilia with cuties.
twitter thread
netflix's tweet

it is being used by outdoor cats as self-heating beds. image

did the cats affect the performance?

the u.s. calls itself a democracy, but in practice it’s more like a system that just looks like one on paper.

first off, the u.s. is not a true multi-party system. it’s structured to push everything into two poles: democrats and republicans. technically there are other parties, like the green party, libertarians, and a few others, but the system is designed so they can’t really compete.

why? because the u.s. uses a “winner-takes-all” voting system. whoever gets the most votes in a state wins all the representation, and everyone else gets nothing. so if a candidate gets 49% of the vote, they get zero representation. smaller parties with 2 or 3% of the vote get completely shut out. over time, voters learn that voting for anyone besides the two big parties is basically wasting their vote. so even if someone likes what the green party stands for, they’ll think “if i vote green, it’ll only help republicans win.” tactical voting becomes the norm: “i can’t pick what i really want, but at least i can try to block what i really don’t want.” this is why third parties get called “spoilers.”

then there’s money. running for office in the u.s. costs millions. the big parties can easily tap into corporate money. the media focuses only on the two big parties, and third parties barely get heard. parties that aren’t seen as having a shot get treated like a joke.

the most blatant example of the system’s flaws is the electoral college. americans don’t elect their president by popular vote. they vote for electors, and those electors decide. with 538 total electors, a candidate needs 270 to win. this system makes it possible for someone to lose the popular vote by millions and still become president. it’s happened more than once: in 2000, al gore got about 540,000 more votes than bush and still lost. in 2016, hillary clinton got around 3 million more votes than trump and still lost. so “one person, one vote” isn’t really a thing here. the system also forces candidates to only campaign in swing states. voters in places like california or texas basically get ignored.

now add lobbying. the 2010 citizens united supreme court ruling made things even worse. it said that spending money on elections is a form of free speech. so now corporations, unions, and the super-rich can pour unlimited money into “super pacs” that run ads and shape public opinion. politicians can’t really win without tapping into this money. and after the election, these donors have huge influence on what laws get passed. ordinary people have little voice compared to big donors.

so how do americans still think they live in a democracy? because at this point “democracy” is more of a brand than a real system. like “freedom” or “justice” or “peacekeeping.” it’s a label people have been taught to be proud of since childhood. public schools teach that the u.s. system is unique and the freest in the world. the media repeats this constantly: “look at china, look at russia.” they never say “look at switzerland or norway.” so americans grow up believing “sure, our system has flaws, but it’s still the best.”

for most people here, democracy means: do we have elections? yes. can i vote? yes. can i criticize the government? usually, yes. so that must mean it’s a democracy. but things like fair representation, media monopolies, and the influence of money barely register for most people. criticizing the system feels like criticizing america itself, and people get defensive. it’s less about what democracy actually is and more about what it symbolizes. for many americans, democracy isn’t a functioning system, it’s part of their national identity.

here are a couple of examples of how aristotle's rhetoric has been used in real life and history:

in a political campaign: a political candidate might use aristotle's rhetoric to win over voters. for example, they might establish their credibility by highlighting their experience and qualifications, appeal to the emotions of voters by discussing issues that are important to them, and present a logical argument by outlining their policies and addressing potential concerns.

in a courtroom: lawyers often use aristotle's rhetoric to persuade a jury or judge. they might establish their credibility by discussing their education and experience, appeal to the emotions of the jury by sharing stories about the impact of the case on the plaintiffs or defendants, and present a logical argument by using evidence and legal precedent to support their position.

in a business presentation: a business person might use aristotle's rhetoric to persuade a potential investor or client. they might establish their credibility by discussing their experience in the industry, appeal to the emotions of the audience by highlighting the benefits of their product or service, and present a logical argument by discussing the financial projections and potential return on investment.

overall, aristotle's rhetoric can be used in a variety of contexts where effective communication is important. it can help speakers to persuade their audience by establishing their credibility, appealing to their emotions, and presenting a logical argument.

the walt disney company is one of the largest and most successful entertainment companies in the world. founded by walt disney and roy o. disney in 1923, the company has grown to include a wide range of businesses, including film and television production, theme parks, and consumer products. some of the most well-known disney characters, such as mickey mouse and snow white, were created during the company's early years, and they have become beloved by generations of children and adults around the world. in addition to its iconic characters, disney is known for its commitment to innovation and storytelling, and it continues to be a leader in the entertainment industry.

for what it's worth.

a person who takes extreme pride in his or her own country, to the exclusion of others.

journalist ida b. wells-barnett launched a campaign against lynching after a white mob lynched three african americans in 1892 in memphis. she paid a price for her vocal opposition. the newspaper offices where she worked were wrecked and her life was threatened by racists. she moved to new york and then chicago, and continued writing and lecturing about lynching until her death in 1931. with the help of the naacp, the demand for antilynching laws became part of the progressive agenda. although more than 3,000 lynchings had been recorded by the 1920s, southern opposition blocked every anti-lynching bill in congress.

charles iii was the king of spain from 1759 to 1788. he was the fifth son of philip v of spain and elisabeth farnese, and he is known for modernizing the spanish economy and implementing important reforms during his reign. charles iii is also remembered for his support of the arts and sciences, and he is credited with establishing the first spanish observatory and botanical garden. he was succeeded by his son, charles iv, who continued many of his father's reforms.

brought to boston as an eight-year-old slavery in 1761, phillis was bought by the wheatley family to serve in their house. the wheatleys saw how bright she was, and gave her an education. phillis became a writer; when she was 20, book of her poetry made her famous. the wheatleys gave her both her freedom and their name, and her achievement as the first slave to publish a book inspired free blacks for many years.

the first thanksgiving was a feast shared by the pilgrims in new england and the wampanoag indians native to the area. they enjoyed the harvest that the indians had taught the pilgrims to grow.